[Dictatorship versus Democracy]. A Reply to Karl Kautsky. Proofread by Chris Clayton in for the Leon Trotsky Internet Archive. Trotsky. Terrorismo y comunismo: réplica a Karl Kautsky. Front Cover. Leon Trotsky. Akal, Bibliographic information. QR code for Terrorismo y comunismo. Terrorismo y comunismo by Karl Kautsky at – ISBN – ISBN – Júcar. – – Softcover.

Author: Bragami Kekasa
Country: India
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Automotive
Published (Last): 19 January 2004
Pages: 342
PDF File Size: 5.60 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.92 Mb
ISBN: 817-6-56208-641-9
Downloads: 83405
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kazrakora

He criticizes the Paris Commune for not being ruthless enough in rooting out capitalism and reactionaries.

Terrorism and Communism: A Reply to Karl Kautsky

Stalin told the Soviet people not to struggle for a more equitable society. They relentlessly criticise the state. Written during the blood-bath that was the Russian civil war, during which Trotsky went from radical organizer and politician with no military experience to master-general and army-builder through sheer improvisation, this is a terrifyingly clear-eyed coomunismo of revolutionary terror and dictatorship.

The autobiography provides little insight into political philosophy, so I chose Terrorism and Communism as a supplement.

Amazon Music Stream millions of songs. It is the dictatorship of a group of largely lower-middle class men utilizing allegedly Marxian analysis and communist end goals to concoct a pragmatic praxis to withstand the civil war and increase production.

Further, there is no basis for believing either group, proletariat or politicians, have any skill whatsoever in running an entire nation-state.

Terrorismo y comunismo: réplica a Karl Kautsky – Leon Trotsky – Google Books

The whole book revolves around Trotsky saying that social democrats like Kautsky are pandering to the bourgeoisie, and true communism must come with violence. Jun 01, Mahmoud Ashour rated it did not like it Shelves: So, back to and the infamous “dictatorship of the proletariat”. And indeed, under Stalin, the people began to vote for state sanctioned candidates.

Open Preview See a Problem? Made more interpretable by Slavoj Zizek. Trotsky looked down his bespectacled nose at the idea of a Free Press, asking – where did it get the West?

Then again, you see where the roots of revolutionary Marxism come from.

Not too good, as it turned out. Trotsky reveals the party philosophy on militarized and compulsory labor, refutes reactionary fictions, tells about the incredible difficulties facing the red army and the people in general during the civil war, and establishes in clear materialist terms his rationale for the harshness of action necessary during that period. I also appreciated the thought-provoking, and just generally provocative, introduction by Zizek wherein he likens the Trotsky of when the book was written to his nemesis Stalin comunsmo a characteristically trolling but firmly historically-grounded way.


I’d like to read this book on Kindle Don’t have a Kindle?

Trotsky will unflinchingly serve up unabashed zingers like: He was one of kxutsky few Soviet political figures who were never rehabilitated by the Soviet administration.

With regards to the book giving the impression that the Soviet policies were overwhelmingly successful in converting dissidents to its cause, it should be noted that at the time of writing, the only dissident left-wing movement in Russia consisted of Mensheviks, whose organisations were intimidated, disrupted and ultimately disbanded; the later conflicts with anarchists, makhnovists and disgruntled peasants — ultimately giving rise to the NEP — were of a far graver nature, and would presumably lead Trotsky to at least reformulate some policies advocated in the book.

These are hardly marxist principles, and in fact sound like spitball ideas at a Ford Motor Company board meeting. Speaking from an Irish position, I would not want the state to control everything. To ask other readers questions about Terrorism and Communismplease sign up. Be the first to ask a question about Terrorism and Communism. Once in a while the reader decides to give the energy demanded by Trotsky’s polemical style, but only once in a while.

If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support? Amazon Inspire Digital Educational Resources. Dictatorship was terroriwmo transitional necessity, the horror of which had to be presented to its subjects, so they would be motivated to overcome it. The state had a monopoly on air travel. Trotsky did at least hint of a future without the Bolshevik Party when he imagined a Russia where the “concentration of state power in its entirety in the hands of the proletariat would set up for the transitional period of an kautskg regime”.

Most of all, he compares the then short terrorism of the rebellion to the Paris Commune and comunimso behaviour of the Western rerrorismo during wartime, demonstrating the power of euphemism in imperialist discourse and journalism, while at other times he tackles issues of democracy comunismoo legality thrown at his feet by German social democrat Karl Kautsky.

Terrorism and Communism: A Reply to Karl Kautsky by Leon Trotsky

Yet, if you go back through history, what other way can we organise ourselves as a species? The arrival of the actual condition of Communism could comjnismo come later, when productivity and organisation have flourished to the extent that free time, instead of defence against imperialism, can become the guiding principle of civilization. You may want to ask the Polish people how they felt about that Leon. Trotsky derided democracy as inherently “bourgeois” in nature. Demolishes the myth of “nice guy” Trotsky.


While Stalin is one of the greatest mass-murderers in history, the Soviet Union was bad from the beginning. Nov 07, Herman Gigglethorpe rated it did not like it Shelves: Throughout “Terrorism And Communism”, he looked down his nose at what he deemed the “worthless masquerade that is democracy”.

This tiny book, little more than a pamphlet, is the literary equivalent of a giant, fire-breathing, communist dragon. In a democracy it is all about the interests of money so much so that in order to run for office you have to have loads of money. Paperbackpages.

The answer is obvious. Trotsky says that many people volunteered for “Communist Saturdays”, but he also emphasizes the need for forced labor.

For Lenin, ascending to this stage meant first and foremost centralizing power to crush the anarchic power structures of capitalism, consciously channelling state violence to eliminate economically discriminatory pain, upending market competition by having the state utterly dominate it, as one great capitalist.

He’s hardly alone in this, and he’s no more dishonest and narcissistic than America’s so-called “Founding Fathers,” its just that I expected—hoped for—more. Love for work is not at all an inborn characteristic: Every Russian of every background should have had the right to determine the future of Russia from onwards. Aer Lingus began making money by cutting costs etc. Trotsky viewed democracy as a “crown” that was increasingly unnecessary as the old institutions of class would “melt away” in a perfectly equal society.

As Kasparov put it, “communism goes against human nature and can only be sustained by totalitarian repression”. The first claim is that the dictatorship of the proletariat is an advancement from liberal democracy.