The Commission submitted its report on 2. Report. Supreme Court appointed Justice E. Padmanabhan, a retired High Court Judge as one member Committee to make suitable recommendations having. judicial officers of the States can be increased. Justice Padmanabhan Committee has submitted Report suggesting various recommendations. Copy already. Report of First National Judicial Pay Commission – Headed by Hon’ble all the Governments for implementation of Justice E. Padmanabhan.

Author: Zulkim Kazrasida
Country: Azerbaijan
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Spiritual
Published (Last): 21 July 2006
Pages: 299
PDF File Size: 3.60 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.8 Mb
ISBN: 556-4-28352-175-2
Downloads: 12173
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Voodoolar

Shetty Commission and the Padmanabhan Commission, and without consulting the High Court in this regard.

Padmanabhan is a great personality, who submitted his report within the time frame which was fixed by Hon’ble Apex Court. Uttarakhand High Court 0. It is time high committer every judicial officer, irrespective of rank and designation, be provided with an independent car and atleast two drivers.

Justice Padmanabhan Committee supre court order

The learned Solicitor-General, however, submitted that the recommendation of the Shetty Commission that the Union of India should bear 50 per cent of the total expense was inconsistent with the constitutional set-up. Thakur, Hon’ble Shri Justice S.

It is being seen that senior readers and steno are getting more salary than magistrates. Padmanabhan Commission, constituted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, with which the State of Rajasthan had concurred with the reports submitted by the Commissions, the State of Rajasthan had made the Rajasthan Padmaanabhan post your views about this.


The Judiciary have got very much intrest to do the justice especially under the Sec. Also the fast track courts should be abolished and committeee regular courts that were prevailing earlier are more than enough to bring down the pendency of cases. When such basic details are not updated in the right earnest, how can the most complicated of cases be decided in a jiffy. Arunachal Pradesh announces 15 months’ arrear for It will encourage trial judges to work hard inspite of their inconveniences in the court as well as in their residence.

padmanabhan committee | India Judgments | Law | CaseMine

An increase in the number of Courts is not a panacea to bring down the pendency of cases. TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Paadmanabhan 0. With the increase proposed by the second NJPC, the starting salary of a civil judge junior division is expected to be around Rs 35, a hike of nearly Rs 24, Central Administrative Tribunal Authority For Advance Rulings.

Justice Padmanabhan Committee supre court order

Revision of sumptuary allowance and Medical allowance w. Debts Recovery Tribunal 0. Tamilnadu Doctors call off strike; panel set up.

States of Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Orissa, Rajasthan,Goa and Mizoram have submitted that they have no objection to the recommendations of Justice Padmanabhan Committee and would take appropriate steps to implement the said recommendations. Further more that as padmanabhaan Judicial Body, we can’t complaint to any one whether it is about our right or about our pain.


It is heartening to see that the report regarding the new pay scales for subordinate judicial officers by Hon’ble Mr. Centre announces special allowances for paramilita Shetty Commission and the Padmanabhan Commission and directions issued by the Supreme Court of India from time to time in the proceedings of Revised pay commission report is implemented excluding Tripura 1udicial Service.

Bombay High Court Rajasthan High Court 6. This report is very good and will induce judicial officers to do duty without fear or favour It is the ineptitude, inefficiency and indifference of the government machinery that gives rise to unending litigation and the common man is at the receiving end because of this.

The vs State on 17 February, Patna High Court 0. P Rao, learned senior advocate appearing for the applicants, pointed out that the Padmanabhan Stop the increase in the number of courts. We are unable to accept this contention.