(revised ), Business Combinations, (FAS (R)) becomes the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FAS (Business. Combinations) and FAS (Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets) in June. Therefore, SFAS R provides for more changes than Revised IFRS 3 (as amended). The guidance in R applies to mutuals and.
|Published (Last):||10 April 2004|
|PDF File Size:||3.74 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.81 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Effective Date FAS R applies to business combinations that are completed during a year beginning on or after December 15, This Statement does not change many of the provisions of Opinion 16 and Statement 38 related to the application of the purchase method. For example, it eliminates the costs incurred by entities in positioning themselves to meet the criteria for using the pooling method, such as the monetary and nonmonetary costs of taking actions they might not otherwise have taken or refraining from actions they might otherwise have taken.
Recognizing and Measuring the Identifiable Assets Acquired, the Liabilities Assumed, and Any Noncontrolling Interest in the Acquiree This Statement requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions specified in the Statement.
This Statement defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control. Under Opinion 16, business combinations were accounted for using one of two methods, the pooling-of-interests method pooling method or the purchase method.
Summary of Statement No. (revised )
In accordance with Statement and related interpretative guidance, an fab that acquired another entity in a series of purchases a step acquisition identified the cost of each investment, the fair value of the underlying identifiable net assets acquired, and the goodwill on each step. This Statement changes the accounting for business combinations in Opinion 16 in the following significant respects: Therefore, in addition to improving the guidance provided about accounting for a business combination in the authoritative literature, this Statement makes that guidance easier to use.
How the Changes in This Statement Improve Financial Reporting The changes to accounting for business combinations required by this Statement improve financial reporting because the financial statements of fawb that engage in business combinations will better reflect the underlying economics of those transactions.
Concepts Statement 2 states that a necessary and important characteristic of accounting information is neutrality. Transaction Costs Under FAS Rtransaction costs incurred as part of a business combination such as fees for investment banking, advisory, attorneys, accountants, valuation and other experts are to be expensed as incurred.
In contrast to Opinion 16, which required separate recognition of intangible assets that can be identified and named, this Statement requires that they be recognized as assets apart from goodwill if they meet one of two criteria—the contractual-legal criterion or the separability criterion.
FAS (Revised ) (as issued)
This Statement requires an acquirer to measure a noncontrolling interest at its acquisition-date fair value.
Differences between This Statement and Opinion 16 The faeb of this Statement reflect a fundamentally different approach to accounting for business combinations than was taken in Opinion To accomplish that, this Statement establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer:.
Therefore, the acquirer will 141rr separately from goodwill the acquisition-date fair values of research and development assets acquired in a business combination, which improves the representational faithfulness and completeness of the information provided in financial reports about the assets acquired in a business combination. It does not apply to:.
Important Accounting Changes
This Statement requires the acquirer to recognize those costs separately from the business combination. The Board noted that because the purchase method records the net assets acquired in a business combination at their fair values, the information provided by that method is more useful in assessing the cash-generating abilities of the net assets acquired than the information provided by the pooling method.
It requires that an acquirer continue to report an asset or a liability arising from a contingency recognized as of the acquisition date at its acquisition-date fair value absent new information about the possible outcome of the contingency. Restructuring Costs Under FAS Rrestructuring costs of the acquiree that are not obligations as of the acquisition date are charged to post-acquisition earnings.
If the costs will be tax deductible in the future i. Better reflect the investment made in anacquired entity —the purchase method records a business combination based on the values exchanged, thus users are provided information about the total purchase price paid to acquire another entity, which allows for more meaningful evaluation of the subsequent performance fwsb that investment.
The Board concluded that its public policy goal is to issue accounting standards that result in neutral and representationally faithful financial information and that eliminating the pooling method is consistent with that goal.
Statement and IFRS 3 as issued in both required use of the acquisition method rather than the pooling-of-interests method to account for business combinations. How the Conclusions in This Statement Relate to the Gasb Framework The Board concluded that because virtually all business combinations are acquisitions, requiring one method of accounting for economically similar transactions is consistent with the concepts of representational faithfulness and comparability as discussed in FASB Concepts Statement No.
This Statement applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, Defer recognition of preacquisition contingencies until payment is deemed probable and can be estimated.
However, it does not apply to the formation of a joint venture, the acquisition of an asset or a group of assets that does not constitute a business, a combination between entities or businesses under common control, or a combination of not-for-profit organizations or the acquisition of a for-profit business by a not-for-profit organization.
The changes to accounting for business combinations required by this Statement improve financial reporting because the financial statements of entities that engage in business combinations will better reflect the underlying economics of those transactions. This Statement also includes in the definition of contingent consideration arrangements that give the acquirer the right to the return of previously transferred consideration if specified conditions are met.