Understanding Phenomenology has 32 ratings and 4 reviews. Yzobelle said: Fantastic series! Cerbone was able to explain profound philosophy using simple.. . Cambridge Core – Philosophy: General Interest – Understanding Phenomenology – by David R. Cerbone. David R. Cerbone, Understanding Phenomenology, Acumen, , pp., $ (pbk), ISBN Reviewed by Dermot Moran.
|Published (Last):||13 May 2009|
|PDF File Size:||1.89 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.70 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Indeed, Husserl too makes a clear distinction between the ego in its ‘actional’ role, when it is deliberately judging, deciding and so on, and the ego as it is more usually experienced as an absorbed consciousness of the experience undergone.
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. I am surrounded by books, desks, lights, computers, and other apparatus, which I incorporate into my goal-oriented activities. A Guide for the Perplexedas well as numerous articles on Heidegger, Wittgenstein, and the phenomenological tradition.
But one should not always accept that because history is written by the pheno,enology that that version is a true account. Cerbone’s chapter on Merleau-Ponty opens by recognising that Sartre’s account of embodiment is far more nuanced than many give him credit for.
Science Logic and Mathematics. Carlos phenomwnology it liked it Aug 09, Overall, however, he presents these doctrines relatively unproblematically, whereas Husserl himself always conveys an impression of struggling deeply phenomenokogy clarify what he wanted to mean. In one sense, it is of course true that Heidegger dealt a fatal blow to Husserlian phenomenology, in terms of its future popularity among philosophers.
Want to Read saving…. Sign in Create an account. But, as is the case with Heidegger, there is always far more going on in Husserl. Cerbone then moves on to discuss Dasein’s self-understanding and Heidegger’s unrerstanding of how each of us finds ourselves in a particular concernful state of mind Befindlichkeithow the experience of the I involves a certain dissipation into the everyday, worldly ‘ das Man ‘ in a condition of captivation or seduction by the world which Heidegger calls ‘falling’ Verfallen.
Don’t have an account? Wolfgang Walter Fuchs – – M.
Sign in via your Institution. Account Options Sign in. Phenomenology and Imagination in Husserl and Heidegger. Cerbone is well versed in analytic philo A “comprehensive” introduction to a subject I know precious little about.
The book also assesses later, critical responses to phenomenology – from Derrida to Dennett – as well as the continued significance of phenomenology for philosophy today. No keywords specified fix it.
Cerbone’s chapter on Sartre covers the main issues of his phenomenology — the nature of the ego, anxiety, freedom, and so on — and does so in an admirably clear and engaging way. Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your Phwnomenology proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy.
Lists with This Book.
Cerbone correctly documents Heidegger’s departures from Husserlian phenomenology, e. The book traces phenomenology’s historical development, beginning with its founder, Edmund Husserl and his “pure” or “transcendental” phenomenology, and continuing with the later, “existential” phenomenology of Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Monthly downloads Sorry, there are not cerboone data points to plot this chart.
David R. Cerbone, Understanding Phenomenology – PhilPapers
Heidegger speaks of being directly in comportment with ‘environmental understandiny Umweltdinge rather than the ‘mere objects’ of Husserlian direct perception. Crews rated it really liked understandiing Jan 28, Cerbone is associate professor, philosophy, West Virginia University.
Merleau-Ponty is characterised as a phenomenologist of embodiment and of embodied perception, making use of pathological malfunctions to shed light on the hidden workings of ‘normal’ conscious experience.
John rated it really liked it Dec 11, Paperbackpages.
Understanding phenomenology – David R. Cerbone – Google Books
Here Levinas and Derrida are treated as challenging phenomenology in various ways Levinas with his emphasis on the face and the need to prioritise the other over oneself; Derrida for his deconstructive critique of presence.
Cerbone clearly explains Heidegger’s focus on ontology but somewhat glides over the fact that Heidegger insists that ontology understandong possible only as phenomenology. Derrida and Husserl on Time.
Husserl is surely right to wonder precisely from what attitude Heidegger is conducting his own inquiry into everydayness.